![]() Unfortunately, these errors make this tool much less useful than it at first appears. Incidentally, Neo has messed up the depth map quite badly on the grass in enclosed areas (eg, between the figures) and around the bag. It made it very easy to include all the details at the edges of the figures. I find Affinity's Refine mask capability very effective. ![]() Lots of problems so I hope it has a future.Īlso hope Affinity will bring some Ai masking like photoshop. Overall new to using Neo but impressed with its simplicity. Also use \ key to see I only touched up the areas that needed it. Yes used the smallest brush size and 0 softness to correct missing hair. ![]() It was always possible to do it very laboriously, but this tool makes it pretty easy. The advantage of doing it in post is that you remain in control, and can correct errors. This is the sort of thing that smartphones attempt to do, but often get wrong. If those are present and matter, you need to do your own masking. ![]() My conclusion is that Neo's Portrait Bokeh tool is very quick and easy to use, but it can't be relied on to get detailed edges perfect, particularly not individual hairs. The subjects are now very well separated from the blurred, darker background. I found that it didn't do a perfect job on the edge details and the grass, so I used Affinity Photo to produce a more refined mask, and combined the two: The depth map was also confused by the grass background between the people, blurring it much too much. Lots of creamy bokeh, but hair and earring detail lost. I then did a quick pass using the Portrait Bokeh tool: This is the JPEG I produced from it:Īs expected, not much background separation in a 1" sensor f/4.5 image You can then blur and darken the background to taste.įirst, the image I downloaded from DPR and processed from raw a sample file. The tool attempts to identify and mask human figures, and applies a depth map to the background. I've tried the Pokeh Bokeh tool, with good, but imperfect results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |